The recently released Independent Review of Bullying, Harassment and Sexual Harassment at the Bar paints a sobering picture of the legal profession.
It identifies entrenched cultural issues — hierarchy, opaque work allocation, lack of HR infrastructure, financial dependence on senior “big earners”, and a reluctance to challenge poor behaviour — as structural problems that allow misconduct to persist.
These findings are consistent with long-standing concerns within the profession:
Against this backdrop, The Barrister Group (TBG) stands out as a fundamentally different model — one that has been designed from the ground up to avoid these pitfalls.
Founded in 2001 (originally as Clerksroom) by Stephen Ward and Harry Hodgkin, TBG was created to break away from the entrenched hierarchy and politics of traditional chambers. Unlike most sets, which are run by barristers themselves, TBG is private equity backed and professionally managed as a commercial enterprise.
This means:
The review highlights that in many chambers, clerks’ rooms can be “male-heavy and old school”, with reliance on personal relationships for work distribution — creating room for bias, exploitation, and even harassment.
TBG tackles this directly through its Fair Allocation of Work Policy, which uses:
This system gives barristers genuine autonomy over their practice — deciding when, where, and how much they work — while ensuring fairness and transparency for all.
Traditional chambers are governed by a constitution created and amended by members, often making enforcement of standards slow or politicised.
TBG instead operates under a Service Level Agreement which every barrister must adhere to, alongside a comprehensive suite of policies that set clear behavioural, ethical, and professional expectations.
This allows TBG to:
One of the review’s strongest criticisms is that traditional chambers often fail to take meaningful action against misconduct, particularly by senior, high-earning members.
TBG’s Performance Management Policy is a formalised, proactive process that:
Because TBG is not financially dependent on any individual barrister, it can take action against misconduct without fear of financial destabilisation — a key weakness in many traditional sets.
The review notes that many barristers operate in high-stress, adversarial environments without adequate support, and that wellbeing issues often go unaddressed until they escalate.
TBG’s Wellbeing Policy embeds psychological safety and preventative measures into its operations, with:
In essence, TBG’s structure removes the key structural weaknesses identified in the independent review:
The Independent Review makes clear that the Bar’s traditional structures can perpetuate bullying, harassment, and poor behaviour. The Barrister Group’s model — with its flat structure, transparent processes, and professional governance — is designed to prevent these very problems.
While cultural change is challenging across the profession, TBG demonstrates that with the right structure, transparency, and leadership, a chambers can be both commercially successful and a safe, fair, and supportive place to practise.
For press and marketing queries, please contact marketing@thebarristergroup.co.uk.
To find out more about joining The Barrister Group, please get in touch with our membership team: membership@thebarristergroup.co.uk.