Personal Injury & Civil Appeals
Charles acts in personal injury cases for both claimants and defendants, particularly where the facts are contested or the claim raises wider issues of principle or process. He has successfully appealed decisions on the basis that the judge reached a decision that no reasonable judge could have made, as well as overturning costs orders despite a trial judge’s wide discretion on costs. Recent appeal cases include: Charles will identify appealable points, work constructively with solicitors, and distil complex procedural errors into persuasive arguments at appellate level. - Woodcock v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police [2023] EWHC 1062 (KB) appealed to the Court of Appeal [2025] EWCA Civ, with an application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court (see below) - Suffolk County Council v Lyall [2025] EWHC 1032 (KB) Council liable for failing to put anti-slip strips on boardwalks in forest resulting in serious injury - Mckenzie v Alexander Beds Limited [2024]: (unreported) fundamental dishonesty overturned; indemnity costs and interest awarded against Defendant. The Claimant was an aspiring barrister at the start of her career, having valiantly fought many other struggles, including racial prejudice. See Patricia Mckenzie's book here . - Ruzge & Anor v Ashghar [2024] EWHC 78 (KB) overturning a costs order - Sternbaum v Dhesi [2016] EWCA Civ 155: repairing obligations of landlords clarified - Osman v Adan [2016] EWCA Civ 1256: retrial ordered due misunderstanding by judge and failures of both trial Counsel
Police Misconduct & Civil Liberties
Charles built much of his early practice on publicly funded work, particularly in civil actions against the police for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution – often under legal aid when it was more widely available. While the current legal aid landscape limits such work, he remains committed to acting in cases involving misconduct, abuse of power, and systemic injustice, often through direct access instructions. Notable work includes: Charles’s most recent case is that of Woodcock v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police [2023] EWHC 1062 (KB): representing a woman seriously injured by her former partner after police failed to telephone to tell her that he was waiting for her outside her home. The police successfully appealed to the Court of Appeal [2025] EWCA Civ 13). Charles has settled Grounds of Appeal to the Supreme Court - A claim for malicious process in obtaining an order for detention - A civil jury awarding £600,000 in aggravated and exemplary damages to a claimant beaten and falsely arrested by police - Acting for a claimant repeatedly arrested, prosecuted and assaulted by his police officer neighbour - Acting for a police officer arrested on suspicion of burglary - Representing a university professor arrested under the Mental Health Act, with allegations of misfeasance by a force’s professional standards department in investigating his complaint
Current Cases
- An appeal to the High Court in a claim for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. - An appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal against a decision not to permit amendment to add a very late claim of discrimination where the employee had only recently concluded that he had been a victim of discrimination. - A Employment Tribunal claim against a major supermarket that the claimant's line manager had referred to him in Portuguese as " O'Preto" , which put neutrally means "the black one". - A claim involving eviction allegations against a residential landlord.
Publications
Charles writes on issues related to civil justice and police powers, including: Charles’ ongoing interests include writing and researching issues and themes such as: - Off the Record: Solicitors & Courts Are Often Indifferent to Claimants’ Rights to Confidentiality , New Law Journal, Feb 2025 - Police Under No Obligation to Warn of Imminent Attack , New Law Journal, July 2025 - Contributor to: The English of Law , Belin, Paris, 2006 - Women’s rights to same sex medical care and how to achieve that - Civil claims as a route to justice for survivors of gender-based violence - Male wardens in female prisons. Why are they there?
Testimonials
Thank you for your excellent professional advice and assistance in dealing with this difficult matter.
I wanted to write and take this opportunity to thank you for all your kind help and support ...I truly feel that if you had not picked up on this case we would still be waiting. I hope you can be of assistance in the future, it has been a pleasure speaking with you.
Extremely satisfied with Charles Davey and would certainly recommend him as a Barrister .... None compare to his professional and courteous manner.
Privacy Notice
This privacy notice explains how, why and for how long Charles Davey will process or retain your personal data in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
If Charles has been instructed by you, your litigation friend, your solicitor or agent, or through a pro bono referral, it is necessary to process your personal data in order to provide legal services. This may include advising on the prospects of litigation, advising on the value of a claim, representation at hearings or trial, and reviewing legal issues or evidence.
Recipients of your data
Depending on the nature of your case, data may be shared with courts and tribunals, your solicitors or agents, witnesses, experts, other legal representatives, ombudsmen or regulators, education and examining bodies, and current, past or prospective employers.
Special categories of data
Some matters require processing special category personal data, including information about health, ethnicity, religion, trade union membership, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or criminal allegations and convictions. Such data will only be processed where necessary to represent you or advise on your claim.
Retention
Your personal data will be retained for no longer than necessary and, where possible, anonymised. In general, records relating to cases are retained for at least six years to comply with professional obligations under the Bar Code of Conduct and tax record-keeping obligations.
Once your case has concluded and any fees have been paid, only the personal data necessary for regulatory compliance, conflict checking, defence of complaints or fee disputes, and reference in future similar cases will be retained.
Your rights
You may request confirmation that your personal data is being processed, request a copy of that data, request rectification of inaccurate data, object to certain processing, request restriction of processing, or request erasure where the GDPR permits it. Where processing is based on consent, you may withdraw that consent at any time, although doing so may mean Charles can no longer provide the legal services requested.
Security
Appropriate physical and technical measures are taken to safeguard your personal data and prevent unauthorised access, accidental loss, misuse or disclosure.
Complaints or queries
If you have any questions about this privacy notice, or how your personal data is used, please email clerking@thebarristergroup.co.uk or the clerks at clerking@thebarristergroup.co.uk, or call 01823 247 247.
You also have the right to complain to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). Further information is available at ico.org.uk/global/contact-us/.
Work with Charles
Send us your details and a member of the clerking team will be in touch. Or call us now on 01823 247 247.