Professional Disciplinary/Regulatory and Negligence
- Disciplinary hearings or registration problems in all areas but especially the GMC/GDC/NMC - Fitness-to-practice issues
Case profile
QADER & OTHERS V ESURE SERVICES LIMITED [2015] EWHC B18 (TCC) (Current citation is wrong as this was an appeal in the County Court). Appeal as to whether Fixed Recoverable Costs apply to multi-track cases that started in the MOJ low value portal. Dr. G v GMC 2015 Dr. G, a foreign qualified doctor, had successfully completed IElLTS, PLAB 1 & 2 and applied for provisional registration with the GMC prior to starting her Foundation Year. However, she had been given a conditional discharge on 4 counts of falsely obtaining benefits under s.112 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. Despite there being considerable mitigating circumstances and her declaring this on her application the GMC refused her application on the grounds that her fitness to practice was impaired. Ian handled all aspects of the appeal and successfully argued that the conditional discharges were not 'convictions' thus fatally undermining the Assistant Registrar's decision. The GMC re-considered the decision without the need for an appeal hearing and granted Dr G provisional registration without conditions. R (on the application of JOANNA TRAFFORD) V BLACKPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL [2014] EWHC 85 (Admin) A local authority's decision not to renew the lease of premises occupied by a firm of solicitors which represented claimants bringing claims against the local authority was vitiated by the improper exercise of discretion. The decision had not been based on a rational assessment of the relevant considerations, but had been motivated solely by retaliation against the tenant for perceived damage to the local authority's financial interests. BOWYER V KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT (UK) LIMITED (2014) (Unreported) High value PTSD case for a civilian electrical contractor embedded with the British Army in Iraq. Issues included the application or otherwise of the Compensation Act 2006 as well as complex issues of duty of care for stress at work involving the interaction between the military and specialised sub-contractors in a war zone environment. Henry v Liverpool CC (2014) (Unreported) A further case where the Defendant's reliance on the Compensation Act 2006 to avoid a duty of care was successfully rebutted. A school was held liable for failing to supervise a disabled pupil at a para-athlete event resulting in personal injury. Bombis & others v Schiff, Waddicor and Allianz, 2014 Preston County Court : 3 day trial of the same Claimant involved in 2 separate car crashes, each defended on the basis of fraud – each Defendant independently of the other claimed deliberate slam on and queried the identity of the Claimants alleging phantom passengers. Both claims fully successful and all allegations of fraud dismissed. CHURCHILL CAR INSURANCE v VICTOR KELLY [2007] EWHC 18 (QB) Guidance on the effect on legitimate heads of claim of putting forward some dishonest heads. Counsel to GNER in the Selby Rail Disaster Inquest 2002.
Memberships
- PIBA - PNBA - ELBA - Northern Circuit Medical Law Association
Testimonials
I would just like to take this opportunity to thank you for all your hard work and assistance in helping me to win my case. My case has lingered on for years and I been passed from pillar to post, all I can say is I wish I had contacted you and your team five years earlier. A court of law was a completely new and daunting experience for me and I simply couldn’t have done it without your help. You, along with colleague Mr Redfern were highly impressive in the professionalism and attention to detail you put forward. Even from an observer who has never stepped foot in a court room it was clear to see. It was obviously a result of hard work and dedication on your part. I got the result I wanted and more and I couldn’t have done this without you in my corner.
Ian was friendly, knowledgeable and very effective in assisting with defending an application and representing us at court. He provided a high level of client service and I can highly recommend him as a barrister
Ian was friendly, knowledgeable and very effective in assisting with defending an application and representing us at court. He provided a high level of client service and I can highly recommend him as a barrister.
Privacy Notice
This privacy notice explains how, why and for how long Ian Skeate will process or retain your personal data in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
If Ian has been instructed by you, your litigation friend, your solicitor or agent, or through a pro bono referral, it is necessary to process your personal data in order to provide legal services. This may include advising on the prospects of litigation, advising on the value of a claim, representation at hearings or trial, and reviewing legal issues or evidence.
Recipients of your data
Depending on the nature of your case, data may be shared with courts and tribunals, your solicitors or agents, witnesses, experts, other legal representatives, ombudsmen or regulators, education and examining bodies, and current, past or prospective employers.
Special categories of data
Some matters require processing special category personal data, including information about health, ethnicity, religion, trade union membership, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or criminal allegations and convictions. Such data will only be processed where necessary to represent you or advise on your claim.
Retention
Your personal data will be retained for no longer than necessary and, where possible, anonymised. In general, records relating to cases are retained for at least six years to comply with professional obligations under the Bar Code of Conduct and tax record-keeping obligations.
Once your case has concluded and any fees have been paid, only the personal data necessary for regulatory compliance, conflict checking, defence of complaints or fee disputes, and reference in future similar cases will be retained.
Your rights
You may request confirmation that your personal data is being processed, request a copy of that data, request rectification of inaccurate data, object to certain processing, request restriction of processing, or request erasure where the GDPR permits it. Where processing is based on consent, you may withdraw that consent at any time, although doing so may mean Ian can no longer provide the legal services requested.
Security
Appropriate physical and technical measures are taken to safeguard your personal data and prevent unauthorised access, accidental loss, misuse or disclosure.
Complaints or queries
If you have any questions about this privacy notice, or how your personal data is used, please email clerking@thebarristergroup.co.uk or the clerks at clerking@thebarristergroup.co.uk, or call 01823 247 247.
You also have the right to complain to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). Further information is available at ico.org.uk/global/contact-us/.
Work with Ian
Send us your details and a member of the clerking team will be in touch. Or call us now on 01823 247 247.