Ancillary Relief
- Dissipation of assets - Respondents not engaging with court proceedings - Claims of bigamy - Foreign assets - Insolvency
Commercial & Chancery Law
- Particular experience in trusts arising from transfer of substantial assets within a family/friends/carers - Construction disputes - TOLATA - Breach of contract
Memberships & Advisory
- Personal Injury Bar Association - Family Law Bar Association
Case Profile
Personal Injury [private 2017]: successfully defending an EL claim brought by a tandoori chef burnt by the explosion of a tandoori oven (claim settled by a different defendant on appeal) [private 2018]: successfully claimed (settled after adjournment of the 1st date for trial) on behalf of a tenant against a local authority landlord, after falling from the 1st floor to the ground floor, through the ground floor ceiling (floor boards removed), when the local authority's agent-builder was carrying out maintenance on the site [private 2019]: successfully claimed on behalf of a pedestrian in an RTA left with a permanent limp [private 2019]: successfully settled pre-trial. Claim on behalf of a passenger in an RTA against the MIB, left with permanent facial and other injuries following a head-on collision at high speed [private ongoing]: RTA claim. Cyclist left with reduced function in hand on a permanent basis [private ongoing]: EL claim. Employee left with toe amputation, permanent limp and altered gait Financial Remedies [private 2021]: case dealing with the dissipation of assets (6 figure sums transferred to India), client-wife ultimately receiving 80% of capital after add-back (figures notionally added back for sums wasted/dissipated) [private 2021]: case dealing with respondent-husband not engaging with court proceedings. In his absence, client-wife was awarded FMH entirely and a further 6 figure sum (approximately £600,000) after adverse findings [private]: case dealing with bigamy and foreign assets. Settled post-FDR [private]: case dealing with intervention by H's parents' claim against FMH [private]: case dealing with H having no relationship with children of the family and consequent departure from equality [private]: case dealing with apparent insolvent parties Commercial/Chancery Bishop v Bishop: Successful claim re presumed resulting trusts - recovering substantial gifts to family, approx. value 190k (Chancery/Equity) [private]: Successful defence of a 200k plus construction dispute (Construction/JCT contract) [private]: defending a TOLATA claim against 8 London residential properties (TOLATA), concluded by settlement [Private / Prof Neg / Commercial]: successful claim and settlement on a 100% basis of an ex-client v solicitors claim, loss of chance claim following failure to achieve relief from sanctions, consequently no admissible evidence and loss at trial and loss of business/property [private]: Successful settlement of a dispute between licensor v licensee, re commercial property and shared workspaces, and the landlord/licensor's right to offer alternative office spaces [private]: Successful claim for marketing company fees v customer seeking to repudiate contract on an alleged breach of contract and our reliance on an affirmation or agreed variation of terms Appeals Khaira v Service Underwriting, successfully appealed a strike out for Claimant's non-attendance a trial Ogboogu v AIG, successfully appealed a disapplication of QOCS [private], appeal on the meaning of a part 36 offer, obtained permission to appeal and then parties settled [private], successfully defended an appeal on statutory time limits outside the Limitation Act (grant of new residential long lease) [private], defended an appeal on the application of CPR 22PD3A (statements of truths and non-English speakers) for D1, an alternative defendant, D2, settled the claim pre-appeal hearing
Testimonials
Dear Matthew [Instructing Solicitor] I just wanted to pass on some feedback from today's Trial which was represented by Barrister Taj Uddin. From the onset of meeting with Taj, we were taken through the process of the morning with great care and detail, however it was Taj's meticulous attention to detail and professionalism that really surprised us and this made us feel very well looked after and supported. Please do pass these comments on to him and again we would like to thank both him and your team for the support and time you have given us. With kind regards. Mrs Annabbel Foskett [Lay Client] (successfully defended a personal injury claim from a postal worker for dog biting injuries under the Animals Act 1971)
I was very impressed how you grasped the nuance of the transaction and picked up on the bluffing and lies that were []'s only apparent defensive tack - no doubt the health issue will be raised again… [Lay Client] (Enforcing a Promissory Note in the context of a bridging finance deal)
Thanks Taj, news of the result has reached Cyprus! They are really pleased and we will definitely be working together again .. probably for the same client. (successful recovery of breach of contract losses / management agent fees against landlord choosing to go direct with tenant on renewal)
I have only been working with Taj for a few months however everytime I have interacted with him on a case, he has convinced me more and more that he is the Legal equivalent of the Mr. Fix-It; he has taken a tough matter, analysed it and come out with a solution that my clients have found acceptable. Frank Abe, Solicitor (right of way / easement dispute)
Thank you for a job very well done in difficult circumstances. The client was extremely impressed with you and the excellent result you achieved, especially given the initially unsympathetic bench. Your responsiveness and attention to detail is also highly commendable. Although this was our first case together, I certainly would have no hesitation in again using or in recommending your services. (Possession proceedings, mixed commercial/residential)
Privacy Notice
This privacy notice explains how, why and for how long Taj Uddin will process or retain your personal data in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
If Taj has been instructed by you, your litigation friend, your solicitor or agent, or through a pro bono referral, it is necessary to process your personal data in order to provide legal services. This may include advising on the prospects of litigation, advising on the value of a claim, representation at hearings or trial, and reviewing legal issues or evidence.
Recipients of your data
Depending on the nature of your case, data may be shared with courts and tribunals, your solicitors or agents, witnesses, experts, other legal representatives, ombudsmen or regulators, education and examining bodies, and current, past or prospective employers.
Special categories of data
Some matters require processing special category personal data, including information about health, ethnicity, religion, trade union membership, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or criminal allegations and convictions. Such data will only be processed where necessary to represent you or advise on your claim.
Retention
Your personal data will be retained for no longer than necessary and, where possible, anonymised. In general, records relating to cases are retained for at least six years to comply with professional obligations under the Bar Code of Conduct and tax record-keeping obligations.
Once your case has concluded and any fees have been paid, only the personal data necessary for regulatory compliance, conflict checking, defence of complaints or fee disputes, and reference in future similar cases will be retained.
Your rights
You may request confirmation that your personal data is being processed, request a copy of that data, request rectification of inaccurate data, object to certain processing, request restriction of processing, or request erasure where the GDPR permits it. Where processing is based on consent, you may withdraw that consent at any time, although doing so may mean Taj can no longer provide the legal services requested.
Security
Appropriate physical and technical measures are taken to safeguard your personal data and prevent unauthorised access, accidental loss, misuse or disclosure.
Complaints or queries
If you have any questions about this privacy notice, or how your personal data is used, please email clerking@thebarristergroup.co.uk or the clerks at clerking@thebarristergroup.co.uk, or call 01823 247 247.
You also have the right to complain to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). Further information is available at ico.org.uk/global/contact-us/.
Work with Taj
Send us your details and a member of the clerking team will be in touch. Or call us now on 01823 247 247.